The Greenback’s Autumn: The Structural Unravelling of Dollar Hegemony
By R Kannan
For the better part of a century, the US dollar has not
merely been a currency; it has been the world’s financial oxygen—invisible,
essential, and largely unquestioned. Yet, as 2026 unfolds, a "complex web
of systemic inertia" and emerging structural vulnerabilities suggests that
the era of "exorbitant privilege" is entering a period of terminal
decay. From the ballooning $38 trillion national debt to the rise of
sophisticated digital alternatives, the pillars of dollar dominance are being
dismantled with clinical precision.
The USD is facing a structural Decline. To understand why the
US dollar (USD) is facing a structural decline, we can look deeper into the
"Fiscal and Economic Vulnerabilities" that act as the foundation of
its global power.
High National Debt: The Sustainability Crisis
The US national debt has crossed the psychological and
economic threshold of $38.5 trillion (as of early 2026), representing
over 125% of GDP.
- The
Debt-to-GDP Trap: Economists generally consider a 100% debt-to-GDP ratio as a
"danger zone" for advanced economies. At 125%, the US is
entering a territory where it must grow its economy at an impossible rate
just to keep the debt ratio stable.
- Loss
of "Safe Haven" Status: US Treasuries have historically been the world’s
"risk-free" asset. However, as debt piles up, the perceived
risk of a "technical default" or a forced restructuring
increases. If global investors no longer view the dollar as the safest
place to park cash, they will seek alternatives like Gold, the Euro, or
even Bitcoin.
- The
Devaluation Mandatory: To manage such a massive debt, the US government may eventually be
forced to "inflate the debt away." By allowing the dollar to
lose value (devaluation), the government effectively pays back its
creditors with money that has less purchasing power, which is a hidden
form of default that scares away international investors.
Persistent Fiscal Deficits: The "Twin Deficit"
Engine
The US federal government consistently spends more than it
collects in tax revenue, with annual deficits now projected at $1.7 trillion
to $2 trillion.
- The
Borrowing Binge:
To fund this gap, the US Treasury must continuously issue new bonds. This
creates a massive oversupply of "IOUs" in the global market.
Simple supply-and-demand dictates that when the market is flooded with
dollars and bonds, their value relative to other assets drops.
- Monetary
Complicity:
When the private market cannot absorb all this new debt, the Federal
Reserve often steps in to buy it (effectively printing money to fund the
government). This process, known as Debt Monetization, directly
dilutes the value of every dollar currently in circulation.
- Structural
Inertia:
Because much of the spending is "mandatory" (Social Security,
Medicare, and Defence), there is no easy political path to closing this
deficit, making the dollar’s weakening appear inevitable rather than
accidental.
Large Current Account Deficit: The Global Imbalance
The US runs a massive Current Account Deficit (approx.
$800B–$1T annually), meaning it consumes far more from the world than it
produces for the world.
- The
Accumulation of "Global Dollars": For decades, the US has
exported "dollars" in exchange for "goods"
(electronics from China, oil from the Middle East). This has left
trillions of dollars sitting in foreign central banks.
- The
Selling Pressure: As long as the world needed those dollars to buy oil or
settle trade, the dollar stayed strong. However, as
"De-dollarization" picks up—with countries like Brazil and China
trading in their own currencies—foreign entities find themselves with a
"surplus" of dollars they no longer need. If they start selling
these dollars back into the market, the exchange rate could crash.
- Net
International Investment Position (NIIP): The US now has a deeply
negative NIIP, meaning foreigners own significantly more US assets than
Americans own foreign assets. This makes the US economy vulnerable to a
"sudden stop" in foreign capital inflows.
Rising Interest Payments: The "Crowding Out" Effect
As the total debt grows and interest rates remain elevated
(to fight inflation), the cost of "servicing" the debt—simply paying
the interest—has become a top-tier budget item.
- The
Interest Explosion: Interest payments have surged to over $1 trillion annually,
now rivalling the entire Defence budget. By late 2025, interest became the
fastest-growing federal expense.
- Crowding
Out Productive Investment: Every dollar spent on interest is a dollar not
spent on infrastructure, education, or R&D (as noted in your R&D
article). This starves the US economy of the innovation it needs to stay
competitive, leading to slower long-term growth and a weaker currency.
- The
Doom Loop: High
interest payments lead to higher deficits, which require more borrowing,
which leads to even higher interest payments. This "fiscal doom
loop" signals to the world that the US is losing control of its
balance sheet.
Inflation Risks: The Erosion of Purchasing Power
Aggressive "Quantitative Easing" (QE) and the
massive stimulus injections of the early 2020s have fundamentally altered the
dollar’s supply.
- The
20% Inflation Spike: Between 2021 and 2025, the cumulative price increase in the US
exceeded 20%. This means a dollar today buys 20% less than it did just
five years ago.
- The
"Shadow" of QE: Even though the Fed has tried to shrink its balance
sheet, the "ghost" of printed money remains in the system. If
the Fed is forced to pivot back to printing money to prevent a recession
or a banking crisis, it will trigger a "second wave" of
inflation.
- Loss
of Confidence:
A currency’s primary job is to be a "store of value." If the USD
cannot maintain its purchasing power over a 10-year period, it fails its
most basic function, prompting global users to shift toward "hard
assets" like gold or real estate.
The shift in the global order from a unipolar world to a
multipolar one is perhaps the most significant threat to the dollar's long-term
dominance. As of early 2026, these "Geopolitical and Strategic
Shifts" have moved from theoretical risks to active disruptions.
Weaponization of Finance: The End of "Neutral"
Money
For decades, the USD-based financial system was viewed as a
neutral global utility—like the internet or the electrical grid. That
perception changed permanently following the 2022 freeze of $300 billion
in Russian sovereign reserves.
- The
"Single-Key Veto": The US control over the SWIFT messaging system and New
York-based clearing houses gives Washington a "veto" over any
nation’s ability to participate in global trade. By 2025, over 76% of
central bank reserve managers identified "sanctions risk" as
a top factor in asset allocation, up from just 30% before the Ukraine
conflict.
- The
Rise of Parallel Rails: In response, the world is building "financial
firewalls." China’s CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System)
has seen an exponential rise, now facilitating nearly 30% of China’s
cross-border trade, bypassing the US-controlled SWIFT.
- Sovereignty
vs. Efficiency:
Nations are now willing to accept higher transaction costs in alternative
systems to ensure that their national wealth cannot be turned off by a
policy change in Washington.
Geopolitical Fragmentation: The Multipolar Realignment
The world is no longer a single global marketplace; it is
fragmenting into distinct economic "blocs."
- BRICS+
Expansion: The
expansion of the BRICS bloc in 2024–2025 (adding Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran,
Saudi Arabia, and the UAE) created a group that represents over 35% of
global GDP and nearly half of the world's population.
- The
"Commodity-Backed" Prototype: At the 2025 Johannesburg Summit, BRICS nations
confirmed they are prototyping a digital settlement instrument potentially
backed by a basket of commodities (gold, oil, and rare earths). This would
allow member states to trade directly with one another without ever
needing to touch a dollar.
- Institutional
Rivalry: The New
Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
(AIIB) are increasingly providing loans in local currencies (Yuan,
Rupee, Real), reducing the "debt trap" where developing nations
owe money in a currency (USD) they cannot print.
Loss of Petro-Dollar Hegemony: The Anchor is Dragging
Since the 1974 agreement with Saudi Arabia, the
"Petro-Dollar" has been the bedrock of USD demand. If you wanted oil,
you had to have dollars. This era is ending.
- The
Termination of Exclusivity: In 2024, reports indicated that the formal
"exclusivity" deal between the US and Saudi Arabia had lapsed.
By mid-2025, Saudi Arabia was actively settling a portion of its oil sales
to China in Yuan and exploring Euro-denominated trades with
Europe.
- The
Energy Transition Factor: As the world moves toward green energy, the
"Petro-Dollar" is being challenged by the "Electro-Yuan"
or "Lithium-Settlements." China dominates the supply
chain for batteries and rare earth minerals, and it is insisting that
these 21st-century commodities be traded in its own currency.
- Recycling
Flows:
Historically, oil nations "recycled" their profits back into US
Treasuries. Today, they are using that capital for domestic "Vision
2030" projects or investing in Asian markets, cutting off a critical
source of funding for US debt.
Shift in Global Alliances: The "Unpredictable"
Protector
Historically, nations held dollars as part of an implicit
"protection racket"—holding the currency of the superpower that
guaranteed their security.
- Isolationism
and Policy Whiplash: Shifts in US foreign policy—from the "pivot to Asia" to
"America First" and back—have made allies in Europe and the Gulf
nervous. If the US security umbrella is perceived as conditional or
temporary, the incentive to hold the US currency diminishes.
- The
European "Strategic Autonomy": Even traditional allies like France and Germany
are pushing for "strategic autonomy," developing the INSTEX
system (initially for Iran trade) and strengthening the Euro to ensure
Europe can maintain its own trade policy independent of US geopolitical
goals.
- Reserve
Diversification:
The dollar's share of global reserves fell to 58% in 2025, the
steepest decline since the collapse of Bretton Woods. Central banks are
shifting into "Non-Traditional" currencies (Canadian Dollar,
Australian Dollar) and, most notably, Gold.
Sanctions Contagion: The Pre-emptive Exit
"Sanctions Contagion" refers to the fear that any
country could be next, leading neutral nations to "self-sanction" by
moving away from the dollar before a crisis even begins.
- Targeting
Third Parties:
The US increasingly uses "Secondary Sanctions," which punish
banks in third countries (like Turkey or India) for trading with
sanctioned entities. This has turned the USD into a "hot potato"
that many international banks are hesitant to handle for sensitive trades.
- The
"Gold Standard" Resurgence: Between 2022 and 2025, central banks (led by
China, India, and Turkey) purchased record amounts of gold. Gold is the
ultimate "anti-sanction" asset because it can be held physically
within a nation’s borders, making it immune to digital freezes.
- The
Permanent Split:
We are witnessing a "permanent split" in the global financial
system. Instead of one global ocean of liquidity, we are seeing the rise
of "financial islands"—interconnected hubs that operate
independently of US oversight.
Structural De-Dollarization: Rewiring Global Trade
Declining Share in Global Reserves: The Stealth Erosion
The dollar is experiencing what economists call "stealth
erosion." While it remains the top reserve currency, its dominance is at
its lowest point since the end of WWII.
- The
58% Threshold:
In the late 1990s, the USD accounted for over 70% of global reserves.
Today, it has dipped to approximately 58%. This 12% drop represents
trillions of dollars moved into other assets.
- Diversification
into "Non-Traditional" Currencies: Interestingly, the shift isn't
just toward the Euro or Yuan. Central banks are moving into
"active" diversification—holding the Australian Dollar, Canadian
Dollar, South Korean Won, and Nordic currencies. This suggests a world
that prefers a "portfolio" of currencies over a single
"anchor."
- Reduced
Liquidity Premium: As other currencies become more liquid and easier to trade, the
"convenience factor" that once forced every country to hold
dollars is vanishing.
Rise of Alternative Trade Settlement Systems: Bypassing SWIFT
The "financial nuclear option"—banning countries
from SWIFT—has backfired by accelerating the development of rival networks.
- China’s
CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System): CIPS is no longer a pilot
project; it is a global reality. It now connects over 1,400 financial
institutions across 100+ countries. It allows banks to clear Yuan
transactions directly, removing the need for a "correspondent
bank" in New York.
- Russia’s
SPFS and India’s UPI-LNK: Russia’s SPFS and India’s integration of its UPI system
with Singapore, the UAE, and France show that regional powers are building
"local loops" for money. These systems are
"sanction-proof" because they do not rely on US servers or legal
jurisdictions.
Bilateral Trade Agreements: Cutting Out the Middleman
For 80 years, if Brazil wanted to buy goods from India, they
usually had to convert Reals to Dollars, and then Dollars to Rupees. This
"middleman" tax is being eliminated.
- The
India-UAE Success: In 2023-24, India and the UAE successfully settled oil and gold
trades using the Rupee and Dirham. This bypasses the exchange rate
volatility of the USD.
- The
Brazil-China Pact: As the two largest economies in the southern and eastern
hemispheres, their agreement to trade in local currencies removes billions
in annual demand for the USD. This "direct clearing" reduces
costs and increases the economic sovereignty of the Global South.
Central Bank Gold Accumulation: The Return to
"Hard" Assets
Central banks are currently on the longest gold-buying spree
in modern history.
- A
Hedge Against Seizure: Gold is the only financial asset that is not someone else's
liability. Unlike a US Treasury bond, which is a "promise to
pay" by the US government, physical gold held in a domestic vault
cannot be frozen or cancelled by a foreign power.
- Record-Breaking
Purchases: Led
by China, Turkey, and India, central banks bought over 1,000 tonnes of
gold annually in recent years. This suggests that the world’s
"lenders of last resort" are losing faith in "paper"
(fiat) reserves and returning to the "ultimate" store of value.
Withdrawal from US Treasuries: The Funding Crisis
The US relies on foreign countries to buy its debt to keep
its government running. That "appetite" is fading.
- China’s
Strategic Exit:
China has reduced its holdings of US Treasuries from a peak of $1.3
trillion to below $800 billion. This is a deliberate
"de-risking" strategy.
- The
"Price-Sensitive" Buyer: With the US issuing record amounts of new debt, the
lack of foreign buyers means interest rates must stay higher for longer to
attract investors, which further stresses the US fiscal position (the
"Interest Payment" trap mentioned earlier).
Technological and Market Drivers: The Digital Frontier
Rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): mBridge
The most significant technological threat to the dollar is
the mBridge project—a collaboration between the BIS (Bank for
International Settlements) and the central banks of China, Thailand, UAE, and
Hong Kong.
- Real-Time
Settlement:
mBridge allows cross-border payments to happen in seconds, not days,
without using the dollar as a "bridge."
- Eliminating
Correspondent Banking: Currently, cross-border trades require "correspondent
banks" in New York to facilitate the trade. CBDCs allow for
peer-to-peer central bank settlement, making the NY-based banking system
obsolete for those transactions.
Cryptocurrencies and Stablecoins: The Decentralized Hedge
While traditional finance remains sceptical, digital assets
are providing an "exit ramp" for capital.
- Stablecoins
as a Paradox:
Ironically, USD-pegged stablecoins (like USDT) have increased demand for
dollars in the short term, but they have also built the infrastructure for
a "non-bank" financial system.
- Bitcoin
as "Digital Gold": For nations facing high inflation or political
instability, Bitcoin has emerged as a censorship-resistant store of value
that operates entirely outside the reach of the US Treasury.
Emergence of the Euro and Yuan: The Competitive Multipolarity
The dollar no longer exists in a vacuum; it has viable
competitors.
- The
Euro’s Strategic Push: The Eurozone is increasingly pushing for the "international
role of the euro" to shield itself from US secondary sanctions.
- The
Yuan’s SDR Status: The IMF’s inclusion of the Yuan in the Special Drawing Rights (SDR)
basket has forced global institutional investors to hold Yuan-denominated
assets. As China opens its bond markets, the Yuan is transitioning from a
"trade currency" to a "reserve currency."
Regional Financial Regionalization: The Rise of "Closed
Loops"
For nearly a century, the global financial system was
"centripetal," with all roads leading to New York. Today, it is
becoming "centrifugal," pushing power to regional hubs.
- The
ASEAN+3 Model:
Southeast Asian nations, along with China, Japan, and South Korea, are
strengthening the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM).
This is a regional currency swap network designed to provide liquidity
during crises without needing to go to the US-dominated IMF.
- Reducing
the "Bridge" Requirement: Historically, if a Thai company bought goods from
Indonesia, they used the USD as a "bridge" because it was the
only liquid pair. Now, with the rise of Local Currency Settlement
Frameworks (LCSF), these nations are trading directly. This removes
the "rent" paid to US banks and reduces exposure to US monetary
policy.
- The
"Euro-Effect" Elsewhere: Just as the Euro eliminated the need for the USD in
intra-European trade, nascent projects like the "Sur" in Latin
America or the "Eco" in West Africa aim to create regional units
that bypass the greenback entirely.
Declining US Share of Global GDP: The Gravity of Growth
A currency’s strength is ultimately a reflection of the size
and vitality of the economy behind it. In 1960, the US accounted for 40% of
global GDP; today, that figure has shrunk to roughly 15% (on a PPP basis).
- The
Rise of the "Global South": Emerging markets now contribute more to global
growth than the G7. As the economic "centre of gravity" shifts
toward Asia and Africa, it is mathematically inevitable that the currency
used for that trade will shift accordingly.
- Diminishing
Network Effects:
The dollar's strength was a "network effect"—everyone used it
because everyone else used it. As the US share of trade shrinks, the
network effect weakens, making it easier for businesses to justify
switching to more relevant regional currencies.
Institutional and Policy Factors: The Internal Decay
Threats to Fed Independence: The "Fiscal Dominance"
Trap
The Federal Reserve’s credibility as an independent,
inflation-fighting entity is under unprecedented assault.
- Political
Encroachment:
With US debt at $38+ trillion, the government has a vested interest in
keeping interest rates low to minimize debt servicing costs. Both sides of
the political aisle have increasingly pressured the Fed to prioritize
"cheap money" over price stability.
- Fiscal
Dominance: This
occurs when the central bank is forced to print money simply to keep the
government solvent. If global investors believe the Fed is no longer an
independent guardian of the dollar's value but a "printing
press" for Congress, they will dump the currency to avoid the
inevitable hyper-inflationary consequences.
Domestic Political Polarization: The "Default" Theatre
The dollar’s "Safe Haven" status is built on the
belief that the US government is a stable, rational actor. That belief is being
tested by repeated political brinkmanship.
- The
Debt Ceiling as a Weapon: The recurring spectacle of debt ceiling stand-offs and
government shutdowns creates "tail risk." Foreign investors,
particularly central banks, are no longer willing to bet their national
stability on the ability of a polarized US Congress to pass a budget.
- Governance
Premium:
Stability used to be the dollar's "unfair advantage." Today, the
political volatility in Washington is seen as a liability, leading to a
"risk premium" being attached to US assets.
Erosion of Property Rights Confidence: The Precedent of
Seizure
The decision to freeze and potentially seize Russian
sovereign assets was a "geopolitical Rubicon."
- The
Trust Gap:
Sovereign reserves were traditionally considered sacrosanct. By using the
dollar as a tool of statecraft, the US has sent a message to every
non-aligned nation: "Your money is only yours as long as your foreign
policy aligns with ours."
- The
Exit to "Un-seizable" Assets: This has triggered a massive flight to gold and
decentralized assets. Nations are realizing that "digital
dollars" in a ledger in New York are merely "permissions"
that can be revoked at any time.
Shift to Quality-cum-Cost Selection: Managing Exchange Risk
In global infrastructure and procurement (the "Real
Economy"), the dollar is becoming a source of unnecessary risk.
- Exchange
Rate Volatility:
When the Fed raises rates, the dollar spikes, making it impossible for
developing nations to pay back USD-denominated loans. To avoid this,
countries are shifting to Quality-cum-Cost Based Selection (QCBS)
in their trade deals, specifically requesting contracts in local
currencies or stable baskets of goods.
- The
End of "Dollar-Only" Tenders: From oil to infrastructure projects in Africa,
the requirement to bid in USD is being dropped in favour of
"multipolar" bidding, allowing countries to hedge their currency
risks from the start.
Path Dependency Decay: The Generational Shift
Perhaps the most subtle but powerful factor is the fading
"habit" of the dollar.
- The
End of Nostalgia: Older generations of financiers viewed the USD as the only choice.
However, a new generation of digital-native policymakers in the Global
South is coming to power. They grew up with the Yuan’s rise, the Euro’s
stability, and the efficiency of FinTech.
- Fintech
Displacement:
In many parts of the world, consumers move from cash to mobile wallets
without ever touching a traditional bank account. These platforms are
increasingly indifferent to the underlying currency, making it easier for
a "silent switch" away from the USD to occur at the retail and
wholesale levels.
The Cumulative Verdict
The dollar is not falling because of one single enemy, but
because the "Cost of Staying" in the dollar system (inflation,
sanctions risk, and political instability) has finally begun to outweigh the "Cost
of Leaving." As the world builds the infrastructure to exit, the
dollar’s "exorbitant privilege" is transforming into a "systemic
burden."
|
Feature |
SWIFT (Traditional) |
CIPS (China) |
mBridge (Multi-CBDC) |
|
Primary Function |
Financial messaging network (no actual fund transfer). |
Clearing and settlement system for RMB transactions. |
Shared DLT platform for instant CBDC settlement. |
|
Main Currency |
Multi-currency (predominantly USD/EUR). |
Chinese Yuan (RMB). |
Local Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). |
|
Settlement Speed |
1–5 business days (due to intermediaries). |
Near-instant (often under 300 milliseconds). |
Real-time, peer-to-peer (immediate finality). |
|
Cost Structure |
High (multiple intermediary fees + FX spreads). |
Lower (direct clearing with fewer intermediaries). |
Low (removes correspondent bank layers). |
|
Infrastructure |
Centralized messaging (ISO 20022). |
Onshore clearing + CIPS Connector messaging. |
Decentralized Ledger Technology (Blockchain). |
|
Geopolitical Goal |
Maintains Western-led financial status quo. |
Internationalizes the Yuan and bypasses SWIFT. |
Provides "Strategic Autonomy" and anti-sanction
rails. |
|
Current Status |
Global standard (11,000+ institutions). |
Expanding (1,700+ participants in 120+ regions). |
Reached Minimum Viable Product (MVP) stage in late 2024. |
Conclusion: From Unipolar to Multipolar
The transition from a "service-first" global
financial model to a multipolar one requires a "structural overhaul"
that Washington seems ill-prepared to lead. As domestic political polarization
creates "tail risk" and threats to property rights undermine
confidence, the world is moving toward "strategic autonomy".
The dollar is not facing a single "assassin," but
rather a "coordinated withdrawal". For the global investor, the
lesson is clear: the safety of the greenback is no longer a fact of nature—it
is a hedge that is becoming increasingly expensive to hold.
No comments:
Post a Comment