Saturday, September 6, 2025

The Hidden Costs of Tariffs: Why Retaliation Harms the US Economy

 The Hidden Costs of Tariffs: Why Retaliation Harms the US Economy

The report outlines a compelling case for the United States to abandon its current policy of retaliatory tariffs in favour of a more traditional tariff regime. The report, which details the reasons against the current approach, argues that the negative impacts on the U.S. economy and its geopolitical standing far outweigh any intended benefits. The document categorizes these consequences into short-term, medium-term, and long-term effects, highlighting a consistent pattern of economic harm and strategic disadvantage.

Short Term Impact

The short-term impacts of retaliatory tariffs are the most immediate and visible consequences. They represent the initial shock to the economic and political systems, affecting consumers, businesses, and international relations almost overnight.

1. Higher Inflation

Retaliatory tariffs act as a tax on imported goods. When a country imposes a tariff, the cost is often passed on to domestic consumers. This leads to an immediate increase in prices for a wide range of products, from consumer electronics and clothing to raw materials and industrial components. This price hike directly contributes to higher inflation, as a significant portion of what Americans buy is either imported or contains imported parts. This "tariff tax" on consumers is a direct and noticeable hit to household budgets.

2. Loss of Consumer Purchasing Power

As prices for goods and services rise due to tariffs, the real income of consumers effectively shrinks. This means that a person's paycheck can buy fewer goods than it could before the tariffs were imposed. This loss of purchasing power reduces consumer spending, which is a key driver of the U.S. economy. When consumers have less money to spend, overall economic activity slows down, affecting businesses and job growth.

3. Disruption of Supply Chains

Global supply chains are intricate networks built over decades to optimize efficiency and cost. Retaliatory tariffs can instantly shatter these networks. Businesses must scramble to find alternative suppliers in countries not affected by the tariffs, which is often a more expensive and less efficient process. This short-term disruption can lead to production delays, shortages of key components, and a host of logistical challenges that harm businesses' ability to operate smoothly.

4. Increased Costs for Businesses

Many U.S. businesses, particularly manufacturers, rely on imported raw materials, components, and machinery. Tariffs on these inputs increase their production costs. A U.S. automaker, for example, might face a significant cost increase if tariffs are placed on imported steel or aluminium. These higher costs can squeeze profit margins and make U.S.-produced goods less competitive both at home and abroad. Businesses are then faced with the difficult choice of either absorbing the costs, raising prices, or reducing their output and workforce.

5. Job Losses in Downstream Industries

While tariffs are sometimes intended to protect jobs in a specific sector, their short-term effect is often the opposite. The job gains in the protected industry are frequently outweighed by losses in other industries that are harmed by the tariffs. For instance, a tariff on imported steel might help a few U.S. steel manufacturers, but it can lead to job cuts in the much larger construction, automotive, and appliance industries that use steel as a key input. Furthermore, industries that rely on exports, such as agriculture, can face immediate and severe job losses when other countries retaliate with tariffs on American goods.

6. Financial Market Volatility

The uncertainty and unpredictability of a trade war can create significant volatility in financial markets. News of new tariffs or retaliatory measures can cause stock prices to fall, as investors worry about the impact on corporate earnings and economic growth. This uncertainty makes it difficult for businesses and investors to plan, leading to a "wait-and-see" approach that can stifle investment in the short term. The S&P 500, for example, has been observed to plummet after new tariff regimes are announced.

7. Reduced Business Investment

Heightened uncertainty about future trade policy discourages businesses from making new investments. Companies are less likely to build new factories, purchase new equipment, or expand their operations if they are unsure about their future costs, suppliers, and market access. This hesitation in capital expenditure in the short term has a direct negative effect on economic growth and job creation.

8. Strained Relationships with Allies

Retaliatory tariffs are often a "tit-for-tat" action that can target even the closest U.S. allies. This creates immediate diplomatic friction and erodes the trust that is essential for a stable international order. When countries like Canada, Mexico, or members of the European Union are hit with U.S. tariffs, they may retaliate with their own, damaging long-standing partnerships. This makes it harder for the U.S. to build international coalitions to address other geopolitical and security issues.

9. Agricultural Export Losses

One of the most immediate and painful short-term impacts of retaliatory tariffs is on U.S. agriculture. Countries often target U.S. farm goods as a form of retaliation because they are a politically sensitive sector. American farmers can lose access to major export markets overnight, leading to a sharp decline in commodity prices and a significant loss of income. This can cause immediate financial hardship and even business failures for farmers and agricultural communities.

10. Loss of Trust in International Partners

The use of tariffs as a blunt, unilateral tool in foreign policy erodes the goodwill and trust that are built over decades of cooperation. When the U.S. is seen as willing to disrupt trade for political reasons, other nations may question its reliability as a partner. In the short term, this can lead to a breakdown in negotiations and a more hostile international environment.

Medium Term Impact

The medium-term impacts of retaliatory tariffs are where the initial disruptions begin to solidify into more permanent changes, reshaping the economy and international relations in a way that is often difficult to reverse.

1. Loss of Net Jobs

While tariffs may create some jobs in the protected domestic industries, this is often offset by a greater number of job losses in other sectors. In the medium term, this imbalance becomes clear. Tariffs raise the cost of inputs for other U.S. industries, forcing them to either cut costs or raise prices. As these businesses become less competitive, they may lay off workers. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from other countries on U.S. exports, particularly in agriculture and manufacturing, cause a decline in foreign demand, leading to job losses in those export-oriented sectors. The net effect over the medium term is often a decrease in overall employment, contrary to the stated goals of the policy.

2. Decreased Global Competitiveness

Tariffs make U.S. goods more expensive to produce and less appealing to foreign buyers. In the medium term, this can cause the U.S. to lose market share to competitors in other countries. As an example, if U.S. steel is more expensive due to tariffs on raw materials, a foreign company might shift its production to a country with a more favourable trade regime. This means that even after the tariffs are removed, the U.S. company may struggle to regain its position in the global market, as its foreign competitors have had time to establish new supply chains and customer relationships.

3. Erosion of the Rules-Based International Order

The U.S. has long been a leader in promoting a rules-based global trading system through institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO). In the medium term, a policy of unilateral and retaliatory tariffs undermines these institutions. When the U.S. bypasses established dispute resolution mechanisms and imposes tariffs on its own, it weakens the very framework that has benefited global trade for decades. Other countries may then feel justified in doing the same, leading to a breakdown of the system and a more chaotic, less predictable global economic landscape. This erosion makes future cooperation on a wide range of issues more difficult.

4. Suboptimal Trade Diversion

Instead of bringing production back to the U.S., tariffs often simply cause trade to be diverted from one country to another. For example, if the U.S. imposes a tariff on goods from China, companies may simply shift their sourcing to countries like Vietnam or Mexico. In the medium term, this does not "reshore" jobs or manufacturing but rather simply shifts the economic activity to a third country. This creates a more complex and often more costly global supply chain for U.S. businesses, without achieving the intended goal of domestic job creation.

5. Stifled Innovation

Tariffs can discourage innovation in several ways. In the medium term, the uncertainty they create can cause businesses to hold off on new investments in research and development (R&D). Furthermore, tariffs on imported components can make it more expensive and difficult for U.S. firms to access the critical inputs they need to innovate. For example, a tech company that needs a specific microchip from a country subject to a tariff may have to pay a higher price or find a less-efficient domestic alternative, which can slow down its ability to develop new products.

6. Negative Impact on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

SMEs are often disproportionately affected by tariffs in the medium term. Unlike large multinational corporations, they typically lack the resources to absorb increased costs or to navigate complex new regulations and supply chains. They may not have the capital to invest in new equipment or to find and vet new suppliers in other countries. This can put them at a significant disadvantage, leading to business closures, bankruptcies, and a loss of economic dynamism.

7. Lower Economic Growth

By increasing costs for businesses, reducing consumer demand, and creating a climate of uncertainty, retaliatory tariffs can act as a drag on overall economic growth in the medium term. This can lead to a less prosperous economy, with less investment, fewer new businesses, and a lower rate of job creation than would otherwise be the case. The effects of this slower growth can be felt by a wide range of Americans, from investors to workers.

8. Reduced Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

A country's trade policy is a major factor for foreign companies deciding where to invest. In the medium term, a policy of retaliatory tariffs can make the U.S. look like a less stable and less attractive place to do business. Foreign companies may be hesitant to build new factories or expand operations in the U.S. if they fear that their supply chains will be disrupted or that they will be hit with unexpected tariffs. This can lead to a long-term decline in FDI, which is a key source of job creation and economic growth.

9. Increased Political and Economic Instability

Trade disputes can escalate beyond economic issues, leading to increased political and even geopolitical instability. In the medium term, a trade war can create a cycle of retaliation that is difficult to stop. This can lead to a climate of distrust and animosity between nations, making it harder to address other global challenges. The economic pain caused by tariffs can also fuel domestic political instability and protectionist sentiment, both in the U.S. and abroad, creating a dangerous feedback loop.

10. Loss of U.S. Influence in the Global Economy

When the U.S. retreats from multilateral trade agreements and uses tariffs as a primary tool, it loses its ability to shape the rules of the global economy. In the medium term, other countries may step in to fill the vacuum, creating new trade blocs and agreements that exclude the U.S. This can diminish the U.S.'s long-term influence and a position of leadership, making it harder to advance its interests and values on the world stage.

Long term impact

The long-term impacts of moving away from retaliatory tariffs are profound and shape the United States' and the global economy's trajectory for decades. These effects go beyond simple price changes or job fluctuations and touch upon fundamental issues of economic structure, global leadership, and national security.

Long term impact

1. Global Economic Crisis

A long-term, sustained reliance on retaliatory tariffs can create a dangerous feedback loop that spirals into a global economic crisis. The most cited historical example is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which led to a wave of retaliatory tariffs from other countries. This trade war is widely considered to have deepened and prolonged the Great Depression. In the modern, highly interconnected global economy, a similar event would have catastrophic consequences, disrupting supply chains, freezing international investment, and causing a massive contraction of world trade, resulting in widespread economic hardship.

2. Erosion of the Rules-Based International Order

The U.S. has been a cornerstone of the post-WWII international order, which is built on multilateral institutions and agreements like the WTO. A long-term policy of unilateral tariffs and a disregard for international trade rules fundamentally undermines this system. This signals to other countries that international law and cooperation are no longer primary U.S. priorities. In the long run, this could lead to the collapse of the WTO and the fragmentation of the global economy into rival trade blocs, each with its own rules and standards. This would be a return to an era of "might makes right," which history shows is less stable and less prosperous for all nations.

3. Reduced National Competitiveness

While tariffs may provide a temporary shield for certain domestic industries, in the long term, they can make a nation less competitive. By protecting domestic firms from foreign competition, tariffs reduce their incentive to innovate, improve productivity, and become more efficient. Over time, protected industries can become stagnant and unable to compete on the global stage without government support. This leads to a long-term decline in U.S. competitiveness in a wide range of industries, from manufacturing to technology, as other countries with more open markets become more innovative and productive.

4. Failure to Address Underlying Economic Issues

A long-term reliance on tariffs can be a political crutch that prevents a country from addressing its true economic challenges. For example, a trade deficit is not caused by unfair trade practices but rather by a fundamental imbalance between a country's national savings and investment rates. In the long run, tariffs do not fix this imbalance; they merely rearrange the trade patterns. By focusing on tariffs, policymakers can avoid having to tackle more difficult structural problems, such as a lack of investment in infrastructure or education, which are the real drivers of long-term economic growth.

5. Increased Geopolitical Rivalries and Strained Alliances

The long-term use of tariffs as a punitive tool can harden geopolitical rivalries. Countries that have been hit with tariffs, even U.S. allies, may feel compelled to seek new partnerships and alliances to reduce their dependence on the U.S. This can push countries into the orbit of U.S. adversaries, weakening the U.S.'s influence and creating a more fractured and unstable geopolitical landscape. For example, countries that are subject to U.S. tariffs may be more inclined to join economic blocs led by rivals like China, which can have long-term strategic consequences.

6. Loss of Reputation as a Reliable Partner

In the long term, a policy of unpredictable and retaliatory tariffs damages the U.S.'s reputation as a reliable and stable trading partner. Businesses and governments around the world value predictability and stability. When the U.S. is perceived as a country that uses tariffs as a political weapon, foreign investors and governments may look for more predictable partners. This could result in a long-term decline in foreign direct investment in the U.S. and a loss of trust that could be difficult to regain.

7. De-Globalization and Fragmentation

The long-term consequence of a global trade war is a retreat from the interconnected, globalized world. Instead of a single, integrated global economy, the world could become fragmented into regional trading blocs, with each bloc trading primarily among its members. This de-globalization would reduce the gains from specialization and comparative advantage, leading to a less efficient global economy and slower growth for all. For the U.S., this would mean a smaller market for its goods and services and fewer opportunities for its businesses to grow and expand.

8. Higher Labor Costs Without Corresponding Wage Gains

In the long term, tariffs can lead to higher prices for consumers, which in turn can push up the cost of living. While this might pressure businesses to raise wages, the benefits often do not materialize for the average worker. Instead, the increased profits from a protected market may simply go to corporate executives and shareholders. Over time, this can lead to a long-term decline in real wages and a lower standard of living for the working class, despite the rhetoric of "protecting" jobs.

9. Reduced National Security

While tariffs are sometimes justified on national security grounds, a broad-based trade war can ultimately undermine national security. By straining alliances and disrupting global supply chains, tariffs can make it harder for the U.S. to access critical materials and components in a time of crisis. A weaker, less prosperous economy, which is a long-term consequence of protectionism, also means fewer resources for defence and security.

10. Entrenched Protectionism

Finally, a long-term reliance on tariffs can become a self-perpetuating cycle. Once protectionist policies are in place, the industries that benefit from them will have a powerful incentive to lobby to keep them. This can make it politically very difficult to reverse the tariffs, even if they are harming the broader economy. This creates a long-term structural problem where inefficient and uncompetitive industries are propped up by the government, leading to a persistent drag on economic growth and innovation for decades to come.

 

Retaliatory tariffs are a blunt and self-defeating instrument. They fail to address the root causes of economic challenges, such as trade deficits, and instead inflict pain on American consumers, businesses, and allies. To secure a prosperous future, the U.S. must return to its role as a leader in a stable, rules-based global trading system. US must abandon this harmful cycle of retaliation and re-engage with the world on a foundation of trust and mutual interest.

 

Friday, September 5, 2025

India’s Economic Momentum: A Consumption-Led Growth

 India’s Economic Momentum: A Consumption-Led Growth Story Amid Global Headwinds

India's economy stands as a testament to resilience and strategic foresight, defying global headwinds to emerge as the world's fastest-growing major economy. While external challenges persist, the nation's economic momentum is fundamentally driven by a powerful engine: domestic consumption. This internal strength provides a crucial buffer against international shocks, allowing India to chart a confident and stable growth trajectory.

The latest data from the National Statistics Office (NSO) paints a clear picture of this dynamism. India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expanded by a robust 7.8% in the April–June 2025 quarter, marking a five-quarter high. This impressive performance, which exceeded market forecasts, is a direct result of strong showings across key sectors. The services sector, for instance, recorded a stellar 9.3% growth, while manufacturing and construction also posted gains of 7.7% and 7.6% respectively. This broad-based growth underscores the economy's fundamental health.

A major contributor to this success is the sustained strength of private consumption, which accounted for approximately 61% of India's GDP in the first quarter of the fiscal year. This reliance on internal demand makes the economy less vulnerable to fluctuations in global trade. It's a stark contrast to export-heavy economies that are more exposed to international protectionism and geopolitical tensions.

The government's proactive policy measures have significantly enhanced this domestic growth story. The recent, radical reform of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a game-changer. By simplifying the tax structure to a two-slab system of 5% and 18% and reducing rates on a wide range of essential goods and services, the government has put more money directly into the hands of consumers. This move is expected to boost affordability and stimulate demand, particularly in the run-up to the festive season. The GST rate on small cars and motorcycles up to 350cc has been reduced from 28% to 18%, while taxes on household essentials like packaged foods, personal care products, and even cement have seen significant cuts. This consumer-centric approach is designed to fuel a new cycle of consumption-led growth.

Digitalization, Financial Stability, and the Export-Import Landscape

Beyond consumption, the democratization of digitalization has become a powerful force for economic inclusion and growth. India's digital economy contributed 11.74% to the GDP in 2022–23 and is projected to reach nearly one-fifth of the country's overall economy by 2030. Initiatives like the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have revolutionized financial transactions, processing over ₹44 lakh crore through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) alone. The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is also empowering small businesses by providing them a level playing field in the e-commerce space. The widespread adoption of digital tools has not only enhanced efficiency but has also provided citizens with greater access to essential services and economic opportunities.

The financial health of the Indian economy has also improved significantly. The Reserve Bank of India's Financial Stability Report highlights a resilient banking system with strong capital buffers. The gross non-performing assets (GNPA) ratio of scheduled commercial banks has moderated to a 12-year low of 2.8% as of March 2024. India's foreign exchange reserves stood at a record high of USD 697.9 billion in mid-2025, providing a robust safety net against global economic shocks and covering over 11 months of imports. This financial stability creates a conducive environment for both domestic and foreign investment.

However, the recent imposition of high import tariffs by the U.S. presents a direct challenge to certain sectors of the Indian economy. The 50% tariff on goods like textiles, leather, and gems and jewellery could severely impact Indian exporters, as the U.S. is a major market. For example, the gem and jewellery industry exports over $10 billion to the U.S., accounting for nearly 30% of its total global trade. The tariffs could lead to job losses and a significant decline in export volume. While the U.S. tariffs will impact some sectors, the overall impact on India's GDP is expected to be contained, as exports to the U.S. account for only around 2% of India's total economic output.

In response, the government is actively working on a multi-pronged strategy to support exporters. This includes creating monetary and non-monetary incentives and exploring new markets through Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with countries like the UK, Australia, and the UAE. The "Districts as Export Hubs" initiative is a key part of this strategy, aiming to identify and promote products with export potential in every district of the country.

Conclusion: A Vision for Sustained Growth

While global uncertainties loom, India's economic foundation remains strong. Fuelled by a burgeoning domestic market, a transformative digital infrastructure, and a stable financial system, the nation is well-equipped to manage external pressures. The recent GST reforms and government incentives for exporters are not just reactive measures but are part of a larger, cohesive strategy to ensure sustained and inclusive growth. As India continues to capitalize on its internal strengths, it is poised to not only absorb external shocks but also to solidify its position as a dominant force in the global economic landscape. India's journey is a powerful narrative of self-reliance, strategic reforms, and a relentless pursuit of progress.